LV, Cheng, safety officer of the project 6
. 
First, the construction unit did not seriously perform the unified coordination, management responsibilities, site safety management confusion; second, the project safety officer Lu, who is also a construction worker, deleted the supervision unit signature column in the inspection and acceptance form before climbing and descending; third, the project manager was absent for a long time, the safety officer acted as the actual person in charge of the site, pretended to be the project manager, and the relevant parties did not take effective measures to control Fourthly, the working time of safety management personnel and labor service personnel in the project department is inconsistent, and the operation process lacks effective supervision
.
Liao Yihong (team leader) is directly responsible for the accident
.
Hu (project chief engineer) is responsible for the accident
.
Before the accident investigation report accountability list: (1) judicial authorities have taken measures (8 people) 1
.
The project manager, the safety officer and the supervisor were not present, and no one stopped the scaffolder from working in the scaffold, and no warning area was set below, which led to the vertical cross operation with the plasterer below
.
Recently, we learned from China’s judicial documents website that recently, the case was sentenced in the second instance
.
（1） The direct cause of the accident is that the steel wire rope is used to replace the lifting support of the climbing frame, all anti falling devices and anti overturning devices of the climbing frame are removed artificially, and the signal line of the synchronous control device is pulled out
.
11 relevant responsible persons were sentenced
.
Guan Mou Ming, director and deputy chief engineer of the chief engineer office of the municipal safety supervision station 6
.
Xu Mou Wei, deputy chief of the first supervision section (employed personnel) of the municipal Safety Supervision Station accident review at about 13:10 on March 21, 2019, 16.5-19 floor, northeast corner of No
.
When the load near the lifting point of the climbing frame increases, causing local damage, the frame loses the overload protection and shutdown function, resulting in chain reaction, resulting in the overall fall of the frame, which is the direct cause of the accident
.
The court of first instance held that 11 people, including LV, Cheng and Hu, violated the relevant safety management regulations in production and operation, resulting in a major casualty accident
.
The other nine defendants were also sentenced separately and were prohibited from engaging in work safety related occupations for several years
.
At about 12:30, seven workers went to the 19th floor of the tower to continue to lower the decoration frame
.
Hu Yiyou The chief engineer and production manager of the project 5
.
Zhao, Yun, person in charge of the subcontract project 7
.
The court finally rejected the appellant Lv’s appeal and upheld the original judgment
.
The circumstances were particularly bad, and their behaviors constituted the crime of major accident
.
Xie (manager of safety department) is directly responsible for the accident
.
Zhang Mou de (director) is directly responsible for the supervision of the accident
.
After the incident, Hu, LV, Xiao, Yang and Liu participated in the forgery of the notice of comprehensive shutdown and rectification of safety problems on March 18, the letter on safety management of on-site climbing frame on March 19, the letter on immediately stopping on-site climbing frame down operation on March 21, the notice of climbing frame down operation on March 13 (the operator is Liao Junhong and others), and the team Safety activity records, climbing frame descending safety technical disclosure and technical disclosure records, external wall plastering technical disclosure records and other information, and repeated collusion in the evening of March 24 and noon of March 25
.
The direct cause of the accident is that the operators work on the falling frame and cross work on the landing frame in violation of regulations
.
As a result, four workers carrying out outdoor plastering work on the ground frame of the 5th floor fell to the ground together
.
During the falling process, it collided with the floor type scaffold at the bottom of the cross-linked vertical tower, resulting in 7 deaths and 4 injuries
.
（2） Indirect reasons: 1
.
The direct cause of the accident is that the operators work on the falling frame and cross work on the landing frame in violation of regulations
.
101A cross linked tower of AVIC Baosheng offshore cable project in Yangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone The attached lifting scaffold fell during the descending operation
.
The appeal reasons and defense opinions of the appellant LV and his defenders for changing the sentence of probation are lack of facts and legal basis, which can not be established, and the court will not accept them
.
Six workers fell from high altitude with the decoration frame and collided with the ground frame of the bottom tribe
.
Xiao Yibiao, person in charge of the safety department of the actual construction unit of the climbing frame; 3
.
Seven people died after rescue
.
At about 13:10, the northeast corner decoration frame fell when it was descending
.
After the accident, Yangzhou Municipal People’s government set up a “321” major accident investigation team and issued an investigation report
.
Yang, manager of the project engineering department 3
.
Zhao (Project Leader) is responsible for the accident
.
Zhang Mou De, chief supervision engineer of the project of the supervision company 5
.
Li Yiping, contract signer of the climbing frame project, person in charge of the actual construction unit of the climbing frame project; 4
.
Li, bin, labor contractor 8
.
The report identified that the direct cause of the accident was that the steel wire rope was used to replace the climbing frame lifting support in violation of regulations, all the anti falling devices and anti overturning devices of the climbing frame were removed artificially, and the signal wire of the synchronous control device was pulled out, resulting in the load increase at the lifting point near the frame, causing local damage In case of failure, the frame will lose its overload protection and shutdown function, resulting in chain reaction, resulting in the overall fall of the frame
.
Zhang, Ping, legal representative and general manager of the actual construction unit of the climbing frame (2)
.
LV Mou Cheng (Safety Officer) was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment; Hu Mou (Project Chief Engineer / Production Manager) was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment
.
After the sentence was pronounced, two defendants appealed and the last defendant withdrew the appeal
.
Confusion of project management
.
Liu Yiwei, safety officer of the project Department of the actual construction unit of the climbing frame; 2
.
Project management confusion, illegal command, project affiliation, illegal subcontracting and scaffolder with false certificate, project supervision is not in place and so on are the indirect causes of the accident
.
Illegal command.
.
Xiao Biao (person in charge of safety department) is directly responsible for the accident
.
It was found that the defendant LV Mou Cheng (Safety Officer) was mainly responsible for the accident, and Liu Mou Wei (Safety Officer) was mainly responsible for the accident
.
In March 2019, an attached lifting scaffold collapsed at the construction site of a submarine cable project in Yangzhou City, causing 7 deaths and 4 injuries
.
The court of first instance held that at about 12:00 on March 21, 2019, plasterer song Yiyi was repairing holes in the decoration frame on the 18th floor of the vertical tower, while workers such as sun Yiyi, Zhang Yiyi, Xu and Wang Yiji continued to move to the north side of the vertical tower according to the construction progress and plastered on the landing scaffold that failed to pass the acceptance, and did not take corresponding anti falling measures
.
The other 9 defendants (safety officer, person in charge of safety department, team leader, manager of safety department, chief engineer, manager of Engineering Department, general manager of actual construction unit of climbing frame, person in charge of project, actual contractor of actual construction unit of climbing frame, etc.) were also sentenced respectively, and were prohibited from engaging in work safety related occupations for several years
.
Li (the actual contractor of the actual construction unit) is responsible for the accident
.
The court sentenced Lv to four years’ imprisonment, forbidding him to engage in work safety related occupations within three years from the date of completion of the penalty or parole; Hu to three years’ imprisonment, forbidding him to engage in work safety related occupations within three years from the date of completion of the penalty or parole
.
2
.
Liao, Hong, leader of the scaffolding team of the actual construction unit of the climbing frame 2
.
Yang (manager of Engineering Department) is directly responsible for the expansion of accident consequences
.
Li Yiping (general manager of the actual construction unit of the climbing frame) is responsible for the leadership of the accident
.
Xie, Chuang, project manager Safety department manager 4
.
It is suggested that the criminal responsible personnel (6 persons) should be investigated 1
.
Yangzhou intermediate people’s Court of Jiangsu Province held that the facts identified in the first instance judgment were clear, the evidence was true and sufficient, the nature of the judgment was correct, the sentencing was appropriate, the trial procedure was legal and should be maintained according to law
.
