Source: Civil Engineering bar Author: if the siege lion has any infringement, please contact to delete
. 
Another design institute’s qualification has been revoked, and many people have been punished! The reason is very simple
.
The general layout is unreasonable, the fire prevention distance is not enough, and windows are set in the room near the explosion danger
.
The most important thing is that the construction unit did not complete the construction according to the drawings, but the design institute illegally participated in and agreed to the completion acceptance
.
Accident replay: at 18:42:33 on July 12, 2018, a major explosion and fire accident occurred in Yibin Hengda Technology Co., Ltd., located in Yangchun Industrial Park, Jiang’an County, Yibin City, causing 19 deaths and 12 injuries, with a direct economic loss of more than 41.42 million yuan
.
One of the indirect causes of the accident is the violation of laws and regulations in the design and construction of the plant
.
Randomly change the general layout design, change the use function of the warehouse, expand the storage scale of dangerous chemicals and other chemical raw materials; arbitrarily change the design and production varieties, equipment layout and quantity, adjust the floor height of the workshop, and do not perform the design related change procedures; equipment selection and installation, pipeline direction and process piping are all decided by the experience of the enterprise personnel, without re calibration Under the circumstances of checking and changing the design, the construction was organized; the qualified supervision unit was not entrusted to carry out the supervision of equipment and pipeline installation; the construction project completion acceptance was organized without the acceptance conditions
.
Under the circumstances that the fire resistance rating of 11 buildings did not reach grade II and the project anti-corrosion was basically not carried out, the house construction project completion acceptance was organized by itself in violation of regulations
.
Punishment to the Design Institute: instruct Luzhou City Administration and Law Enforcement Bureau to impose a prescribed upper limit fine on Luzhou Lutianhua Chemical Design Co., Ltd
.
and its directly responsible executives and other responsible personnel, order them to suspend business for half a year, and instruct the Department of housing and urban rural development to impose an administrative punishment of revoking their chemical engineering design qualification
.
Crimes of the Design Institute: failing to strictly implement the requirements of national laws, regulations, standards and specifications, failing to seriously conduct in-depth evaluation and engineering analysis on the basic data provided by the construction unit, failing to implement the mandatory standards for engineering construction in the design of safety facilities and construction drawings issued by the Design Institute; insufficient basis for the preparation of the design of safety facilities, failing to carry out safety risk assessment in the project The results showed that the design was carried out under the condition of “fire protection code for petrochemical enterprise design” (GB 50160-2008), the HAZOP analysis was not strict, the analysis reasons and suggested measures were not completely matched; the general layout was unreasonable, the general layout of the plant was not designed in accordance with the “code for fire protection design of petrochemical enterprises” (GB 50160-2008), the second workshop of nitrification equipment with high risk was arranged between the first and third workshops, and the effective fire and explosion-proof isolation measures were not considered
.
The distance between the analysis room and the second workshop is insufficient, and the glass window is designed for the side of the device with fire and explosion risk; the system design of the control room and the refrigeration station is not carried out; the violators participate in and agree to the completion acceptance of the construction project
.
Part of the design is not designed in accordance with the specifications and punished, of course
.
However, it is also a key point to participate in and agree to the completion acceptance of construction projects in violation of regulations
.
If the owner and the construction unit act recklessly, fail to carry out the construction according to the drawings, invite the Design Institute for acceptance, and the design institute agrees, it is a serious crime
.
According to the investigation report, the design of the project was changed during the construction process, and it was modified by the construction unit itself, without going through the design institute
.
It may also be that the design institute disagrees with the modification, because the modification completely overthrows the product, raw materials and process, that is to say, the original design is basically unavailable and needs to be redesigned
.
Of course, at this time, if the design institute is required to redesign, the design unit should be able to do so
.
In real life, often the owners are not willing to increase the design fee or increase it very little
.
At this time, the design institute will turn a blind eye
.
If the construction is not carried out according to the design, the design unit generally has no right to manage the project
.
Since the construction is not in accordance with your drawings, are the as built drawings still available? What are you doing in the final acceptance?.
.
