Explanation and examples of filling in the form of unit project construction quality evaluation form

Click the blue words above to pay attention to our unit project construction quality assessment form

.

The filling instructions must comply with the “basic rules for filling in the form” and meet the following requirements: 1

.

This form is the unified format of unit project quality assessment form for water conservancy and hydropower projects (including embankment projects)

.

2 unit quantities, only fill in the main quantities of the unit project

.

3

.

The name of divisional works shall be filled in according to the name determined during project division, and marked with “√” in the corresponding quality grade column

.

Major divisional works refer to the divisional works that control the safety, function or benefit of the project, and shall be determined during the project division

.

The symbol “△” shall be added in front of the name of main divisional works

.

4

.

All items in the form shall be filled in by the construction unit according to the quality conclusions reviewed by the project legal person and the supervisor

.

5 fill in at the end of the form: ① the assessor of the construction unit refers to the person in charge of the quality inspection department of the construction unit, and the project manager refers to the person in charge of the quality of the project

.

If the unit project is constructed by a subcontractor, this form shall be filled in and self evaluated by the above-mentioned personnel of the subcontractor, and reviewed, signed and sealed by the person in charge of the quality inspection department of the general contractor and the project manager; ② The reviewer of the supervision unit refers to the supervision engineer who is responsible for the quality control of the project of the unit

.

③ The project legal person reviewer refers to the engineer responsible for the on-site quality management of the project

.

④ Report to the quality supervision organization for approval

.

6 about the quality of raw materials, intermediate products, metal structure and hoist, mechanical and electrical products: for projects with large quantities, they should be included in the quality evaluation of divisional projects

.

When evaluating the quality of unit projects, the quality of raw materials and intermediate products will not be evaluated repeatedly

.

The projects with small quantities are included in the unit project evaluation

.

7

.

Unit project construction quality evaluation standard: all the divisional projects are qualified; The quality accident has been handled as required; The score rate of engineering appearance quality is more than 70%

.

The inspection and evaluation data of unit project construction quality are basically complete; During the construction period and trial operation period of the project, the analysis results of the observation data of the unit project meet the requirements of the national and industrial technical standards and the standards agreed in the contract

.

Excellent standard: all the divisional works are qualified, more than 70% of them reach the excellent level, all the main divisional works are excellent, and no major quality accidents have occurred in the construction; The quality accident has been handled as required; The score rate of appearance quality is more than 85%; The inspection and evaluation data of unit project construction quality are complete; During the construction period and trial operation period of the project, the analysis results of the observation data of the unit project meet the requirements of the national and industrial technical standards and the standards agreed in the contract

.

8 according to the order No

.

49 issued by the Ministry of water resources on December 22, 2017, decision of the Ministry of water resources on Abolishing and modifying some rules and regulations, the regulations on acceptance management of water conservancy construction projects (Order No

.

30 issued by the Ministry of water resources on December 18, 2006, and order No

.

46 issued by the Ministry of water resources on August 19, 2014) were revised, Article 16 of order No

.

48 of the Ministry of water resources on August 1, 2016 (the second revision) is revised as: “after the acceptance of the legal person, the conclusion of quality assessment shall be submitted to the quality supervision organization of the project for approval

.

If it has not been approved, it shall not organize the next stage of acceptance

.

” Therefore, the conclusion of unit project construction quality evaluation is changed to “report to quality supervision organization for approval”

.

The relevant appearance quality evaluation conclusion has also been changed to verification

.

The official account of WeChat public is used to identify the two-dimensional code.

.