Therefore It is decided to conduct the audit in the way of quota pricing and settlement, recalculate all the settlement construction drawings, and recalculate the measure cost.
What is the source of the document? The evaluation principle of the change in the administrative measures for design change of highway engineering is the administrative measures for design change at the provincial level in the 2018 version of highway engineering standard construction bidding document, and the determination principle of the unit price of design change is the administrative measures for design change of Highway Engineering in Gansu Province.
The settlement adopts the list pricing method, and the settlement price is 12 million yuan, In addition, there is a negotiation change of 2 million yuan (the as built drawing and completion acceptance report were not handled for this project, and many changes in materials and practices were not signed).
In addition, there is a table “analysis table of comprehensive unit price of bill of quantities of divisional and subdivisional works” in the quotation of bill of quantities.
Let’s see how to deal with it? The actual case is as follows: after the project is completed, Party B makes settlement according to the later changed construction drawings.
The contract has legal effect, so the contract between both parties shall be observed during the project settlement.
02 intermediaries have no right to change the settlement and pricing method of the project.
The settlement method shall be clarified after handling the as built drawing and completion acceptance report, and the settlement shall be carried out according to the settlement method specified in the contract signed by both parties.
04 the settlement method of the project price in case of change shall be agreed in the contract, the management fee and profit shall not change, and the adjustment method and method of the changed part of the project price in case of change shall be agreed in the contract: for example, reference to the approximate list unit price and the site comprehensive unit price visa of both parties, etc.
In addition, the construction drawing changed greatly with the bidding drawing, which did not meet the conditions specified in the bidding document.
Changes in materials and construction methods, if not signed, cannot be used as the basis for project settlement, but should be based on facts: such as concealed works acceptance records, quality inspection approval documents of divisional and subdivisional works, image data, work contact lists of both parties, meeting minutes and other data documents.
However, Party B insists on settlement in the form of list on the ground that there is a bid winning price in the list, and does not agree to adjust the comprehensive unit price and measure fee.
During the audit of this project, the consulting company determined that the settlement quotation of Party B was inconsistent with the contract price, and the comprehensive unit price and practices of settlement were not consistent with the bidding.
The two sides argued and the negotiations reached an impasse.
If Party B fails to provide these facts, Party A has the right to refuse to pay the change expenses of the corresponding project.
In case of any change during the construction of the project, Party A and Party B shall go through corresponding procedures in time to avoid wrangling during settlement in the future.
03 if there is no factual basis for the change, Party A has the right to refuse to settle the relevant change expenses.
The approved price obtained is much lower than the settlement price of Party B.
How should such differences be judged# The reference solutions are as follows: 01 the settlement method shall be clarified after handling the as built drawing and completion acceptance report.
Firstly, the project has not handled the as built drawing and completion acceptance report, which does not meet the settlement conditions.
In case of change, you can refer to this table to see the composition of comprehensive unit price of bill of quantities, increase or decrease the changed sub items of subdivisional works, reorganize the price, and form the new bill unit price after project change, but the management rate and profit margin cannot be modified.
As an intermediary, the consulting company has no right to change the settlement and pricing method of the project.
It is a difference caused by the settlement and pricing method, and it is also a common situation encountered by the construction unit.
The bidding of the project is based on the list quotation, and the contract between Party A and Party B stipulates that the settlement shall be carried out according to the list unit price.
