Xu Hailin’s application for retrial cannot be established if the basic facts identified in the original ruling are lack of evidence and the application of law is indeed wrong.
The original ruling held that the subject matter of the case had been handled by the people’s court, and it was not improper to reject Xu Hailin’s lawsuit.
16 civil judgment has determined the project price.
1 city project is actually the same project as the (2017) Supreme faminzhong No.
It can be seen that the essence of this case is Xu Hailin’s lawsuit against the determination of the price of the same project on the grounds that the project price determined in (2014) Xinmin Yichu Zi No.
According to the application of Runhua company, (2014) Xinmin Yichu Zi No.
The official account mainly includes the original opinions on the opinions, preface, hot topics and other issues in the field of construction.
263 dispute case between Dongfang Weiye company and Runhua company.
According to the agreement signed between Xu Hailin and Runhua company submitted by Xu Hailin, Xu Hailin and Runhua company have filed a lawsuit with the people’s court in order to recover the project funds from Dongfang Weiye company; Xu Hailin and Runhua agreed to cancel Kuitun branch of Runhua Construction Co., Ltd.
263 (2017).
The official account of official account of sweep down irresistibly from a commanding height in Zhengzhou is sponsored by Shanghai Jianwei (Zhengzhou) law firm.
The gist of the judgment has made an effective determination in the project contracting litigation involved.
Xu Hailin sued and claimed that (2014) Xinmin Yichu Zi No.
Xu Hailin filed a lawsuit on the construction contract of the construction project in this case as the actual constructor of Weiye • Dongfang No.
Welcome to Shanghai Jianwei (Zhengzhou) law firm! Contact: Lawyer Xi Wenzhan, 17737192961 (wechat) address: 8th and 9th floors, block B, Shangdu road and Xinyi louiyuan international building, Zhengdong New Area, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province Tel: 0371-63380963 Fax: 0371-63380963…
Determining the project cost involved in the case based on the third-party appraisal opinion rather than the project settlement is not only the claim of Runhua company, but also reflects Xu Hailin’s will.
Case name: Xu Hailin, Kuitun Dongfang Weiye Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.
If the actual constructor brings a lawsuit again for the same project on the ground of harming his interests, the lawsuit shall be rejected.
The first construction engineering department has compound talents such as structural engineer, cost engineer, first-class constructor (municipal and housing construction), supervision engineer, certified public accountant, tax agent, asset appraiser and investment consultant, which can provide customers with all-round legal services.
1 city project, while Weiye • Dongfang No.
16 case as the litigation agent entrusted by Runhua company.
6230 case by: judgment date of disputes over construction contracts of construction projects: September 26, 2021 judgment summary: this court holds that, This case is a case in which the parties apply for retrial, and shall be examined based on whether the reasons for Xu Hailin’s application for retrial are tenable.
The project price should be determined according to the project settlement signed by Xu Hailin, Dongfang Weiye company and Runhua company; Without Xu Hailin’s knowledge, Dongfang Weiye company and Runhua company reached a mediation agreement in the second instance procedure of supreme law Minzhong case No.
(2014) Xinmin Yichu Zi No.
On this basis, Dongfang Weiye company and Runhua company reached a mediation agreement in the second instance procedure of supreme law Minzhong case No.
The above facts prove that Xu Hailin knew and actually participated in the litigation of (2014) Xinmin Yichu Zi No.
16 civil judgment also stated that the entrusted litigation agent of Runhua company in the case was Xu Hailin, and Runhua company applied for a third-party appraisal of the project cost involved in the case.
after Dongfang Weiye company transferred the project funds into the account of Runhua company, Runhua company remitted the balance to the account designated by Xu Hailin after deducting the corresponding management fee.
16 civil judgment, the project cost of Weiye • Dongfang No.
It belongs to the two level public address of Shanghai Jianwei (Zhengzhou) law firm.
263 civil mediation statement is indeed wrong and damages his civil rights and interests.
263 (2017), which belongs to the interests of malicious collusion and unauthorized disposal of Xu Hailin.
The first instance of this case (2014) Xinmin Yichu Zi No.
16 civil judgment and (2017) supreme law Minzhong No.
16 civil judgment was based on the third-party appraisal opinion, but the appraisal opinion was made based on the wrong construction drawings and should not be adopted.
1 city project is determined according to the third-party appraisal opinions.
and other civil rulings on disputes over construction contracts of construction projects trial court: Supreme People’s court case No.: (2021) Supreme faminshen No.
