[netizen opinion 4] the level of the general generation is still not enough.
Therefore, the court did not support the opinion of a construction company in Qinghai that a fine of 100000 yuan should be deducted from Hu’s project payment.
Check one by one.
The contractor can only sign a contract with Party A.
A construction company in Qinghai asked the supervisor to deduct Hu’s 100000 yuan fine.
The support should be accepted in layers and sections again, No, call the chief engineer of your unit for acceptance.
The supervisor can not be fined, but the supervisor has the right to replace the incompetent personnel of the construction unit.
You punish me, but Party A is unwilling.
I can only pretend.
The total price of Hu’s construction project was more than 800000 yuan.
Clear your mind first.
Then report to Party A.
For other major hidden dangers, measures such as mandatory suspension of construction can be taken, but the penalty is this.
[introduction] in the field of construction engineering, it often happens that the supervision unit will impose fines on the actual constructor for the progress lag, quality and other problems in the construction process, so does the supervision unit have the right to impose fines on the constructor? [real case] in a project, the representative of the director went to the site to demonstrate the formwork support, found problems and asked for rectification.
Are there drawings for the plane, vertical and horizontal sections of the high formwork? Let them supplement, such as collecting wells, high and low spans, beam column joints, joint details and check calculation books.
[interpretation by case] in September 2013, a construction company in Qinghai signed a project contract with Hu, which agreed that a construction company in Qinghai would subcontract part of its contracted project to Hu for construction.
If I were the general generation, I would go back and turn over the scheme.
Source: building one quality official account recommendation? Just click while you’re watching..
If the chief engineer of a state-owned enterprise comes, you must blame the chief engineer of the project.
In November and December 2013, the supervision unit of the project issued a fine of 100000 yuan to Hu on the grounds that Hu’s construction progress lagged behind and affected the construction of subsequent types of work.
If the chief engineer who promotes the manager in the next project can fight with the production manager.
After hearing, the court held that the authority of the supervision unit was audit, inspection and acceptance, and did not have the administrative right to impose a fine.
It can’t be said that the supervisor is a dog of Party A.
The same is mingmian Kung Fu.
[netizen’s opinion 3] both parties have an agreement.
The personnel of the construction unit refused to accept and made unreasonable arguments, so the following scene occurred: [netizen opinion 1] the supervisor has no right to fine because the supervisor has no contractual relationship with the contractor.
Hu appealed to the court and asked a construction company in Qinghai to pay him more than 800000 yuan.
However, for particularly major safety problems, the supervision unit can immediately require the contractor to stop work for rectification.
Well, the chief engineer must tear up with the production manager at the regular production meeting.
The contract cannot be signed by three parties.
But I don’t understand the words of the general generation.
If not, let them check the calculation again, either rework on site, or re organize the scheme review, and then let their single technical director review it again.
[netizen opinion 2] Party A has authority, but it is Party A who is really fined.
In March 2014, a construction company in Qinghai settled with Hu.
Check the wall thickness of the steel pipe.
At this time, Party A may impose a fine on the contractor.
You can play with some responsible directors.
Therefore, the supervision unit has no right to fine the construction unit, but for the construction unit’s evasion of work and materials, failure to construct according to the agreement and failure to complete the construction on schedule, The supervision unit can use supervision measures or claim for breach of contract in accordance with the contract, and cannot impose fines on the construction unit beyond its authority.
There is no contractual relationship.
As the service party of Party A, the supervisor can only have the supervision and management right of three controls, three management and one coordination.
Both parties agreed on the construction period.
This kind of high formwork must be full of loopholes.
It’s best to have a three-dimensional modeling.
You may not be fined if you have a way to follow the rules.
After the contract was signed, Hu entered the site for construction.
the supervisor has legal responsibility.
If Party A supports it, Party A will punish the construction unit according to the fine.
Judge’s interpretation: according to the provisions of the administrative punishment law of the people’s Republic of China, fine refers to the punishment method in which the administrative punishment organ forces the violator to pay a certain amount of money to the state within a certain period of time.
Generally speaking, the third party has no right to dispose of the funds of both parties.
