During the lifting of floor tiles by the command tower crane, he did not pay attention to the risk factors behind him due to answering and making phone calls, resulting in falling from the edge of the rotating bar to the floor of the pool and being injured.
8 tower crane, through the walkie talkie to command the tower crane to carry out the transportation.
After rescue, he died.
For the same project, an object strike accident occurred four months ago.
2.
3.
The company’s safety management is not standardized, the relevant rules and regulations of safety management are not formulated in combination with the actual situation, and the safety production responsibility system is not established; As a constructor of the company, Tan * has not received safety education and training and passed the examination; During July 24-29, the safety officer was not at the project site, and the company did not arrange other qualified personnel to replace him.
Zhang * Jun, general manager of the construction unit, suggested that the district law enforcement emergency bureau should impose administrative punishment according to law.
The construction unit failed to coordinate and manage the safety production work of the construction unit, failed to timely urge the construction unit to set up protective railings on the free side of the rotating bar, failed to formulate relevant rules and regulations for safety management in combination with the actual situation, and failed to establish a safety production responsibility system.
When the on-site workers tied the hook and the tower crane was ready to lift, Tan * retreated from the center of the rotating bar to the outside, waved to Li * Zhu with a hand gesture to indicate the direction of movement, and maintained a telephone conversation with Zheng * Yu.
2.
Responsibility identification and handling suggestions of accident responsible personnel 1 Tan *, the constructor of Pingtan Wuyue square residential demonstration area, has insufficient safety awareness and is directly responsible for the accident.
2.
It is suggested that the district law enforcement emergency bureau should impose administrative punishment according to law.
(the previous accident is not within the supervision scope, and this accident is within the supervision scope) responsibility identification and handling suggestions of accident responsible personnel 1 Li * Hua, the mechanical equipment dispatcher of Huashi company, commanded the excavator to directly move the I-beam without eliminating the hidden dangers on the site, resulting in Luo * Ming’s injury and final death caused by the I-beam thrown out, and was responsible for the accident.
Four workers of the construction unit laid floor tiles on the top plane of the rotating bar, and the project manager Tan * Hong supervised the construction on site.
2.
At about 15:20, the construction worker Tan * came to the top of the rotating bar and needed to be removed because a pile of floor tiles affected the construction of workers.
Finally, Tan * withdrew from the edge of the rotating bar and fell to the ground of the pool and was injured.
It is shown that the deceased was a construction worker of the construction unit.
Direct cause 1 In the process of digging the I-beam by the excavator, the I-beam is not bound, resulting in uneven stress.
Chen *, general manager of Huashi company (actual construction unit).
Indirect cause 1 The main responsibility of safety production of the construction unit is not implemented in place.
Tan * Hong, the project manager of Pingtan Wuyue square residential demonstration area of the construction unit, suggested that the district law enforcement emergency bureau should impose administrative punishment according to law.
At about 15:26, Tan * called Zheng * Yu, the tower sling team working nearby, and asked to arrange the tower crane to help with the transportation.
This time, it is the pile foundation and foundation pit support project subcontracted by Party A! At about 14:00 on March 19, 2021, an object strike accident occurred at the construction site of Wuyue Plaza Project in Haitan area, resulting in one death and a direct economic loss of 970000 yuan.
It is suggested that the district law enforcement emergency bureau should impose administrative punishment according to law.
Lin * Jin, chief supervision engineer of the project supervision company.
According to the on-site inspection, the top plane of the rotating bar was 3.2 meters away from the bottom of the ground pool, and the height of the place where the deceased fell was 3 meters.
It is suggested that the District Public Security Bureau file a case for investigation according to law.
The direct reason is that the construction unit did not set up protective railings on the free side of the rotary bar in time as required; Tan * was lack of safety awareness.
Huashi company (the actual construction unit) did not formulate excavator operation procedures and did not require non operators to leave the operation area when organizing excavator operation.
For the construction unit, it is decided to impose an administrative penalty of RMB 275000; For the project manager, it is decided to impose an administrative penalty of RMB 15000; For the construction unit, it is decided to impose an administrative penalty of RMB 305000; The general manager of the construction unit decided to impose an administrative penalty of 43200 yuan.
It is suggested that the district law enforcement emergency bureau should impose administrative punishment according to law..
At the time of the incident, the free side of the rotating bar was not provided with protective railings.
Zheng * Yu informed Li * Zhu, the commander of No.
Lin * Ying, the mechanical operator involved, operated the excavator to directly move the I-beam without eliminating the hidden dangers on the site, resulting in Luo * Ming’s injury and final death by the I-beam thrown out, and was responsible for the accident.
Recently, the Emergency Management Bureau issued four administrative punishment decisions against the construction unit, the construction unit, the project manager and the general manager of the construction unit.
3.
5.
The engineering supervision company failed to perform the supervision duties in place, and failed to timely deal with the hidden dangers such as insufficient qualification of the construction unit and insufficient allocation of full-time safety production management personnel.
Zhang * Jun, general manager of the construction unit.
In view of his death in the accident, it is recommended not to be held accountable.
Indirect cause 1 The safety production rules and regulations of Huashi company (the actual construction unit) are not perfect, the excavator operation procedures are not formulated, the full-time safety production management personnel are not equipped in the project as required, the employees are not educated and trained, safety technical disclosure, etc., and the project manager Yang * Guo is not on duty for a long time.
The accident occurred on the afternoon of July 28, 2021.
The construction unit has not established a safety production responsibility system and contracted the construction project to Huashi company without corresponding qualification; Construction without construction permit.
It is suggested that the District Public Security Bureau file a case for investigation according to law.
He was sent to Fuzhou 900 hospital for rescue and died.
3.
4.
One of the I-beams pops up, knocking down non operators in the operation area to death.
At about 15:30 on July 28, 2021, a falling accident occurred in the open area of Wuyue Plaza sales department in Haitan area, resulting in one death and direct economic loss of about 2.17 million yuan.
2.
