Hongxin XXX company has not established a safety production responsibility system and contracted the construction project to Huashi company without corresponding qualification; Construction without construction permit.
After rescue, he died.
Luo * Ming was sent to Pingtan branch of Peking Union Medical College Hospital for rescue because of his serious injury.
Direct cause of accident: 1 In the process of digging the I-beam by the excavator, the I-beam is not bound, resulting in uneven stress.
(Anhui No.
On the afternoon of July 28, 2021, four workers of Shanghai Jianfang (Party A’s subcontractor) company laid floor tiles on the top plane of the rotating bar, and the project manager supervised the construction on site.
During the first operation, Lin * Ying, under the command of Liu * ya, after Liu * Ya tied and hung two I-beams on the excavator bucket with steel wire rope, operated the excavator to drag the I-beam to the South until Liu * Ya signaled to stop.
One of the I-beams pops up and knocks down the non operators in the operation area to death.
The engineering supervision company failed to perform the supervision duties in place, and failed to deal with the hidden dangers such as insufficient qualification of the construction unit and insufficient allocation of full-time safety production management personnel in time.
At about 15:26, Tan * called Zheng * Yu, the tower crane leader of Anhui No.
At about 18:00, he died after ineffective rescue.
3 construction as the general contractor), who was working nearby, and asked to arrange the tower crane to help with the transportation, Zheng * Yu informed the commander of tower crane No.
When the on-site workers tied the hook and the tower crane was ready to lift, Tan * retreated from the center of the rotating bar to the outside, waved to Li * Zhu with a gesture to indicate the direction of movement, and maintained a telephone conversation with Zheng * Yu.
This time, Party A subcontracts the pile foundation and foundation pit support works! At about 14:00 on March 19, 2021, on the south side of building 13 of Wuyue Plaza Project (phase I), the support team of Huashi company was preparing the shotcrete project.
2.
Later, Li * Hua commanded Lin * Ying to move directly with an excavator without binding the remaining I-beam.
(the previous accident is not within the scope of supervision, and this accident is within the scope of supervision) combined with the current judicial point of view, the accident liability of the general contractor and the subcontractor should be determined according to the following different situations: (1) the general contractor collects management fees from the subcontractor.
If the subcontractor has a safety accident, the general contractor shall bear joint and several management liability, and the subcontractor shall bear the main responsibility; (2) If the main contractor illegally subcontracts or subcontracts to units without corresponding qualification level or safety production license, the main contractor shall bear the main responsibility for safety accidents; (3) If the main contractor fails to provide the subcontractor with the information related to the project construction before construction, resulting in the subcontractor’s failure to take corresponding safety technical measures and safety accidents, the main contractor shall be mainly responsible; (4) In case of tower crane collision between the main contractor and the subcontractor at the same construction site, the main contractor shall be mainly responsible.
Li * Hua assigned Lin * Ying to drive Doushan 220 excavator to the operation area.
However, in case of tower crane collision due to illegal command and operation, the unit to which the illegal command and operation personnel belong shall be mainly responsible; (5) In case of any safety accident due to the arbitrary demolition and modification of safety protection facilities by operators, the unit to which the demolition and modification personnel belong shall be mainly responsible; (6) In case of safety accidents due to quality defects or hidden dangers of early construction, the unit of early construction shall be mainly responsible.
8 Li * Zhu via walkie talkie to command the tower crane for transportation.
In the process of commanding the tower crane to lift the floor tiles, he didn’t pay attention to the risk factors behind him due to answering and making a phone call, resulting in falling from the edge of the rotating bar to the floor of the pool and being injured.
Direct cause of the accident: Shanghai construction company failed to timely set up protective railings on the free side of the rotating bar according to the requirements of the technical code for safety of high altitude operation in building construction (jgj80-2016); Tan * was lack of safety awareness.
Indirect cause of accident: 1 The safety production rules and regulations of Huashi company are not perfect, the excavator operation procedures are not formulated, the full-time safety production management personnel are not equipped in the project as required, the employees are not educated and trained, safety technical disclosure, etc., and the project manager Yang * Guo is not on duty for a long time.
In the process of moving the I-beam, an I-beam was suddenly thrown out and knocked down Luo * Ming and Li * Hua standing opposite the excavator.
Huashi company did not formulate the excavator operation procedures and did not require non operators to leave the operation area when organizing the excavator operation.
Finally, Tan * withdrew from the edge of the rotating bar and fell to the ground of the pool and was injured (3 meters high).
At about 15:20, the construction worker Tan * came to the top of the rotary bar and needed to be removed because a pile of floor tiles affected the workers’ construction.
Because the I-beam stacked in the operation area (with a length ranging from 9 meters to 12 meters) affects the operation of the jet grouting machine, Liu * ya, the team leader, proposed to Li * Hua, who is responsible for the on-site scheduling of machinery, to use an excavator to move the I-beam.
2.
Indirect cause of accident: 1 The main responsibility of safety production of Shanghai Jianfang company is not fully implemented.
It’s the same project.
3 Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.
Finally, we must sign a security agreement! Be sure to divide the working face! If Party A signs the contract directly, Party A shall do the same!..
He was sent to Fuzhou 900 hospital for rescue and died.
The company’s safety management is not standardized, the relevant rules and regulations of safety management are not formulated in combination with the actual situation, and the safety production responsibility system is not established; As a construction worker of the company, Tan * has not received safety education and training and passed the examination; From July 24 to 29, the safety officer was not at the project site, and the company did not arrange other qualified personnel to replace him.
As the employer of the project, Hongxin XXX company failed to coordinate and manage the work safety of Shanghai Jianfang company in a unified manner, failed to timely urge Shanghai Jianfang company to set up protective railings on the free side of the rotating bar, failed to formulate relevant rules and regulations for safety management in combination with the actual situation, and failed to establish a safety production responsibility system.
2.
3.
