Party A agrees to give us 10% of the premium.
The settlement price is 12million yuan, and there are another 2million yuan of negotiation changes (the project has not handled the completion drawings and completion acceptance reports, and many materials and practice changes have not been signed).
Now we want to return the materials supplied by Party A.
■ 2: when the list is settled, how to settle after the adjustment of material price difference and provisional estimate, and when the contents of the list sub items are adjusted, according to the contract? The adjusted price of material price difference and provisional estimate can be implemented according to the contract, but if the content included in the list item changes, how to deal with the increase or decrease? In addition, if Party A stipulates that the price of a changed single sub item will not be adjusted within a certain limit, how should we avoid risks? At the same time, does this clause apply to the price after the change of the contents of the above list? ■ answer: during settlement, the adjustment of material price difference and provisional estimate should be in accordance with the contract.
In addition, the construction drawings and the drawings at the time of bidding change greatly, which does not meet the conditions specified in the bidding documents.
Party B insists on settlement in the form of list on the ground that there is a bid price in the list, and does not agree to adjust the comprehensive unit price and measure fee.
the question is whether the 5million yuan is recorded as the measure fee and the regulatory fee? In addition, will the 10% premium of 500000 also be charged with measure fees and fees? ■ answer: the materials provided by Party A and the measure cost are two independent costs, and there can be no relationship between them.
If the list item changes, the price should also be re combined, but it must be approved by the construction unit or the supervisor.
For example, the original bidding basis is based on the belt foundation, which was later changed to the full hall foundation, and the full hall foundation must be reorganized? ■ answer: according to the specific requirements of the contract for settlement items, it is necessary to analyze whether the material price is lump sum and whether changes in the contents of the list items cause changes in measures.
Therefore, whether there is signature when both parties confirm to settle at the fixed price is correct regardless of the price.
No matter what causes the change, the fees and taxes shall be adjusted according to the settlement amount.
If there is no requirement, it is necessary to analyze this contract type, whether it is an open contract or a closed contract.
Later, due to the financial reasons of the construction party, the project was suspended and could not be resumed for up to 18 months.
The content is sorted out and published by the official account of cost communication, and the copyright belongs to the original author.
■ 4: the group price of the comprehensive unit price of the new project in the bidding project settlement.
When the consulting company audits this project, the settlement quotation based on Party B is inconsistent with the contract price, and the comprehensive unit price and method of settlement are not consistent with the bidding.
The measure items shall be analyzed whether the change is caused by the change of quantities.
There are two parts to the change of list items: the first is the change of quantities, and the second is the change of work content.
The second is the specific requirements for design change or visa according to the contract.
If there is no requirement, the price should be combined according to the actual material price.
The first one is completely adjusted according to the limit requirements of the price of individual sub items.
■ 5: how to solve the increase or decrease of quantities caused by the error of quantities in the bill of quantities? ■ answer: according to the specific requirements of the contract for settlement terms.
If not, both parties have to re determine the settlement method before handling the settlement.
How should such differences be judged? ■ answer: the focus of this question is whether to use quota pricing and settlement method.
■ 7: I.
■ 6: now there is a project, which is priced with a bill of quantities.
in the construction contract of the construction project, according to the total project price of the preliminary budget, the labor insurance premium should be more than 180000 yuan, but both parties agreed in the contract to pay 150000 yuan.
If it is according to the contract, it belongs to the scope of claim.
The construction party believes that the contract is signed as “lump sum use”, that is, whether the project is increased or reduced, it should be lump sum of 150000 yuan and will not be adjusted.
When both parties terminate the contract and settle the actual completed project, only 80000 yuan of labor insurance premium shall be charged according to the normal charging standard.
The approved price obtained is much lower than the settlement price of Party B.
The final cost excluding the materials supplied by Party A is 10million yuan, and there are another 5million materials supplied by Party A.
The two sides argued and the negotiation reached an impasse.
■ 3: how to deal with several aspects of the bidding project in the bill pricing mode when handling the completion settlement (the contract indicates that the settlement is based on the actually completed quantities, that is, whether the bill error is exceeded or not is not considered): ⑴ if there is an increase or decrease in the quantities, the divisional engineering cost can be calculated according to the bid unit price; Should the measure fee in the original bid price be adjusted accordingly? (2) after the direct fee or the measure fee is adjusted, should the fees in the original bid be adjusted accordingly? (3) whether the tax will be adjusted accordingly? ■ answer: after the quantities increase or decrease, the sub items and sub items shall be adjusted according to the actual situation.
The construction party believes that the labor insurance premium of the original contract is reduced to 150000 yuan from the budget of 180000 yuan, and the labor insurance premium of the actual completion should also be reduced in the same proportion, and should be reduced in proportion from the labor insurance premium of 80000 yuan? How should such situations be handled? Under the above circumstances, the actual settlement total price of the project is far less than the total price of the project at the time of contract awarding, and the cost of temporary facilities is also reduced according to the actual completed quantities..
Therefore, it is decided to conduct the audit in the way of quota pricing and settlement, recalculate all the settlement construction drawings, and recalculate the measure costs.
If there is any infringement, please contact to delete the settlement concept ■ 1: after the completion of the project, Party B has made settlement according to the later changed construction drawings, and the settlement still adopts the list pricing method.
The contract is an adjustable unit price contract.
Generally, the settlement is handled through negotiation between both parties, and the settlement is carried out after the detailed contract terms are supplemented.
Whether the material price is based on the material price quoted by the construction unit when bidding or the actual material price during the project construction.
After the contract is signed, if there is no clear provision, the measures cannot be changed, which is the cost that must be incurred to complete the qualified project.
Of course, if the settlement amount changes, the fees and taxes should be adjusted accordingly.
As for the return of materials supplied by Party A, the construction unit only retains the storage fee.
