The installation of elevators in the old community was originally intended to facilitate daily travel, but was strongly opposed by the residents on the first floor, which hindered the elevator construction on site.
Therefore, the voting is legal and effective.
Article 288 of the Civil Code stipulates that the neighboring obligee of a real estate shall correctly handle the neighboring relationship in accordance with the principles of favorable production, convenient life, solidarity and mutual assistance, and fairness and reasonableness.
Why should he bear the maintenance cost of 1.9 million yuan? ● if the alimony agreed in the divorce agreement is low, can you ask for an increase? The court ruled! ● primary school students are pushed down by their classmates in physical education class, which constitutes level 10 disability.
The court decided that the addition of elevators to the house involved in the case belongs to the matters specified in Item (8) of article 278 of the civil code, which shall be jointly decided by the owners, and shall be approved by the owners who participated in the voting of more than three quarters of the area of the exclusive part and more than three quarters of the owners who participated in the voting.
However, Huang, Liao and their family members obstructed the construction at the site, and the excavators who had already arrived had to stop work.
He sued his ex-wife in court…
Finally, the court ruled that the defendant immediately removed the nuisance and did not affect the elevator installation project.
In case of conflict of interests, the parties shall make a judgment according to the principle of “the lesser of the two evils” through negotiation and weighing the interests of all parties.
The residents of the unit decided to install elevators, but this was strongly opposed by the first floor residents Huang and Liao, who believed that the installation of elevators would have adverse effects on their houses.
It is reasonable and justified for the plaintiff and other owners to request the addition of elevators to facilitate travel and improve the living quality.
Trapezoid Rubber Magnetic Chamfer
The essence of adjacency relationship is the extension or restriction of the content of real estate rights.
The lowest floor is the overhead floor, and there is no elevator.
The defendant and his family members living on the first floor shall properly handle the neighboring relationship and shall not obstruct the installation of elevators organized by the plaintiff and other owners.
There are 14 owners in the unit building with elevators in this project.
It is extremely inconvenient for daily travel.
The system aims to regulate the conflict of interests between the rights of adjacent real estate, to clarify that one party provides certain convenience to the other party, and to tolerate the obstacles caused by providing convenience.
284 elderly people in Xiangtan were cheated by 17 million! Yes! ● can my mother-in-law recover the 970000 yuan from my former daughter-in-law for the house purchase?..
After the voting, the plaintiff and other owners handled the approval and filing procedures for the construction of additional elevators in accordance with the law, and the procedures for adding elevators were legal.
As for the plaintiff’s claim for compensation of 9300 yuan for economic losses caused by work stoppage, it was not supported because no relevant evidence of losses was submitted.
Source: People’s Court of Yueyanglou District, Yueyang City Author: Li Yuting and Zhou Hanyi failed to obtain GIA certificate when purchasing diamond jewelry.
On March 18, 2022, the construction of the elevator installation project began.
The residential area involved in the case has not been installed with elevators before, and the residents on the second floor and above are inconvenient to travel, especially for the elderly or those with inconvenient legs and feet.
Reluctantly, the owners of the 2nd to 7th floors sued the court.
Sentenced! ● the wife rewarded the anchor 140000 yuan, and the husband sued for refund! The court ruled so! ● how to identify the responsibility of the “unlicensed driving” of the motorcycle owner when the “non tethered” rhubarb dog collides with the motorcycle owner? ● after 95, the young man rented a luxury car for one day and had an accident.
Who will bear the responsibility? Yes! ● the square dancing aunt was planted grass when she went to the elderly care institution…
In October 2021, Yueyang Municipal government issued relevant documents to comprehensively promote the installation of elevators in the existing residential buildings.
The customer asked for a refund + three times compensation, and they were sentenced! ● the son who has been raised for 5 years is not his own child.
Can the installation of elevators be carried out successfully? Please look at today’s case! Case review: the unit building of an old community in Yueyanglou District of Yueyang City has 7 floors and 14 households.
The number of owners and the proportion of the area of the exclusive part have reached 6 / 7, which is in line with the aforesaid legal voting ratio.
If the installation of elevators does have adverse effects on the ventilation, sunshine, daylighting, value devaluation and other aspects of the defendant’s house, the defendant may negotiate separately on compensation or compensation or solve it through legal channels, but shall not continue to obstruct the installation of elevators for this reason.
Under the condition that the decision to install elevators complies with the rules of procedure and legal procedures, some owners obstruct according to their own building ownership, which violates the provisions of the civil code on the ownership of owners’ buildings, and also does not comply with the principle of adjacency in the civil code.
