3) if the construction organization design (scheme) is modified, it needs to be re submitted for approval.
The director’s review opinion is: agree to implement.
there are not so many special plans, which mainly reflect the quality safety and progress control methods, Refer to the construction quality and acceptance specifications and technical specifications of relevant special construction.) As for how to review the specific content, to be honest, many professional supervisors and even directors are far from meeting the requirements in this regard.
The supervision unit’s review of the construction organization design and special scheme of the construction unit is mainly divided into several parts: first, preparation and approval procedures.
The review opinions of the professional supervision engineer of the supervision unit are generally as follows: 1) The preparation and submission procedures meet the requirements; 2) The construction organization design (scheme) has pertinence and operability, and no content in violation of national mandatory provisions is found.
Third, safeguard measures for production safety.
Some people can put forward a lot of suggestions for modification, while others can’t see any problems.
Second, quality assurance measures.
Generally speaking, the more formal construction organization design generally includes: cover, catalogue, main quality measures, main safety measures, man-machine and material organization measures, seasonal construction measures, environmental protection measures, emergency plans, progress plans, general layout plans, etc.
The rest of the contents generally include layout plans, emergency plans, etc.
(It is mainly reasonable and operable, with reliable quality, guaranteed safety and civilization measures, and reasonable economy.) Part VI: Conformity of planned progress and construction period requirements.
Fourth, the main mechanical and material safeguards.
(commonly known as procedure compliance audit) mainly depends on whether the preparer, reviewer and approver meet the requirements.
Finally, we must leave a note: if there is any change or modification to the scheme, it needs to be re submitted for approval.
Generally speaking, the preparer is the project engineer (the technical director of the project), the reviewer is the technical director of the construction unit, and the main principals of relevant departments need to sign the review opinions, and the approver is the chief engineer of the construction unit.
Whether the main processes are consistent with the construction and acceptance specifications, and pay special attention to whether there are contents that obviously violate the mandatory provisions of the state.
(You can search the main contents of the construction organization design (scheme) on the Internet.
The contents of the second to sixth aspects are commonly known as targeted and operable review).
I used to recite them backwards, but now I can’t remember them completely.
Therefore, for the review and review of the supervision unit, it mainly depends on whether the preparation and submission procedures meet the requirements, whether the quoted standards are out of date, whether the contents are consistent with the design requirements (too many are applied, and even many contents are wrong, and even the project name is wrong).
Fifth, environmental protection measures.
The reason is that there are too many contents involved in the field of architecture.
These are the basic contents of the constructor examination (the national registered supervision engineer textbook does not give a detailed introduction to the specific needs).
(it is too common for the scheme to be inconsistent with the site, and the supervisor is responsible for checking the implementation of the scheme.
If nothing happens, you are lucky; if something happens, you will have to bear the blame.) The specific review depth varies from person to person.
Some aspects may be familiar to you, but many times your experience can’t reach this height.
This is closely related to an individual’s business ability and will not be described here.
(The construction organization design and special plans for large and dangerous projects exceeding a certain scale need to be approved by the construction unit, while other plans need not be approved by the construction unit, but they need to be retained for future reference.)..
